Carson and Trump don’t understand American conservatism

The campaigns of Ben Carson and Donald Trump once looked unrealistic, but they kept rising in the polls.

Many political pundits said they’d eventually fade and drop out, but they kept rising in the polls.
And then other candidates, the establishment in both parties, and the media viciously attacked them. Yet they survived … and both keep rising in the polls.
Carson and Trump have enthusiastic supporters. They’re bringing new voters into the party, and both poll very well against Hillary Clinton, especially in battleground states. So why is a traditional conservative like myself seriously worried about a potential Carson or Trump ticket? Simple: because neither seems to believe in American conservatism and our movement’s organizing principle – limited government.
One candidate would increase the government’s power to regulate speech – with no thought as to whose speech would actually be silenced. The other sees nothing wrong with the government snatching property from one citizen and handing it to another.
First, let’s look at Trump.
Our Founders believed, as did philosopher John Locke, that one of the reasons governments are instituted is to protect the property of its citizens. We all know that we have a right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” but it was Locke who first wrote that our rights were actually to “life, liberty, and estate.” Thomas Jefferson saw no distinction between property rights and liberty itself, and conservatives have carried that torch throughout our nation’s history.
“Property rights,” philosopher Milton Friedman once wrote, “… are the most basic of human rights and an essential foundation for other human rights.” President Ronald Reagan agreed. During a radio commentary in the 1970s he said, “an individual’s right to possess and control his own property is fundamental to freedom itself.”
So what does Trump think?
Most conservatives believe the worst attack on liberty in recent years was the Supreme Court’s decision in Kelo v. City of New London. The justices ruled that eminent domain could be used to seize private property not just for public uses like roads or bridges, but to sell to developers in hopes of gathering higher taxes from the land.
Conservatives were appalled. Trump was delighted.
“I happen to agree with it 100 percent,” Trump said after the ruling in 2005. “If you have a person living in an area that’s not even necessarily a good area, and government … wants to build a tremendous economic development … now, I know it might not be their choice, but move the person to a better place and yet create thousands … of jobs and beautification and lots of other things, I think it happens to be good.”
Trump obviously doesn’t believe in limited government, and if anyone thinks he wouldn’t increase its power, especially the often-abused presidential executive order, then there’s a bridge in Brooklyn that I’d like to sell you.
Now onto Carson.
Next to ensuring we have private property rights, one of the best reasons to keep government limited is to protect our right to free speech. History proves that if a government has the ability to silence its critics, it will. The only way to protect this right is never give government the ability to control it, even if a benevolent, well-meaning man is the one doing the controlling.
So when Carson was asked a question about the Department of Education, his dangerous misunderstanding of American conservatism shined brightly through.
Carson said that he would use the department to “monitor our institutions of higher education for extreme political bias and deny federal funding if it exists.”
Setting aside the absolute affront to limited government and free speech, who does Carson think would implement his proposal, what are their ideological leanings, and what speech would they consider “bias” on campus? Our education bureaucracy is planted thick with leftists. Give them the power to monitor and punish political speech and it wouldn’t be liberals who were targeted, it’d be conservatives and perhaps even moderates who stray from their institutional group-think. Besides, where would such powers end?
It’s been fun, but now it’s time for the Carsonites and Trumpsters to face the facts: both men have great things to offer our nation, but they cannot be trusted to rein-in our overgrown government.

8 thoughts on “Carson and Trump don’t understand American conservatism

  1. HPV9合1子宮頸癌疫苗 Gardasil

    紅石榴保濕噴霧 重水保濕噴霧 清肌保濕噴霧 瑕疵遮瑕膏 修容霜 護眼修飾霜 眼部遮瑕修護筆 亮白蓋斑霜 香茅SPF30 香茅蚊怕水 古銅暗影粉2號 胭脂輪廓修飾 點綴立體修容 奇幻腮紅 亮麗持久胭脂膏 深層修護滋養潤唇霜 保濕護唇膏

  2. 醫學美容 脫髮 cosmetic.wiki

    別掃興!男生最討厭女生在床上做的4件事 Marie Claire (HK) Edition 無論男生或女生,當然希望每次性愛都可以順利「達陣」,雙方都得到快感,但若然某一方不小心做出某些掃興的行為,有可能會turn-off伴侶,影響性致。到底男生最討厭女生在床上做那些行為呢?為了自己「妹妹」

  3. 醫學美容 癢 cosmetic.wiki

    【引用】部落客小沁 x 搶救立體臉大作戰,5分鐘瘦3公斤的秘密! @ ~ 相信悠美 你會更美 ~ :: 痞客邦 :: 比對人臉黃金比例,下巴頓時只有比例一半的小沁,日前終於徹底大誤自己沒有下巴這回事! 心急的她興沖沖的來到悠美拯救自己的下巴。 施打微晶瓷後,整張臉的比例拉長,頓時像瘦了三公斤一樣神奇! 快點來看小沁變

  4. 醫學美容 腿部 cosmetic.wiki

    【保養】秋冬修護 ✧ 三款臉部及身體產品 – Katerina的花俏部落格 •Beauty •Fashion •Lifestyle 【保養】秋冬修護 ✧ 三款臉部及身體產品, Katerina的花俏部落格 •Beauty •Fashion •Lifestyle: 【保養】秋冬修護 ✧ 三款臉部及身體產品, Katerina的花俏部落格 •Beauty •Fashion •Lifestyle

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.