Conservatives must scrutinize Bill Pryor’s record

President Donald Trump is very close to announcing his choice to replace conservative Justice Antonin Scalia on the U.S. Supreme Court.

“I think in my mind I know who it is,” he recently said.

If we’re to believe knowledgeable court watchers or aspiring Trump whisperers, we know who it is, too: Mobile native Judge Bill Pryor.

Pryor comes highly recommended from all corners of the conservative movement, from the editors at the National Review to firebrand radio host and legal expert Mark Levin. Another Mobilian and frequent conservative writer on these pages, Quin Hillyer, says Pryor would be an “excellent” choice. I’ve read and watched Pryor for years, as well, and have become reasonably confident that he’d be a safe bet to fill Scalia’s robes.

But trusting our side’s experts and being reasonably assured simply isn’t enough. There’s too much at stake, and we’ve been burned far too many times. Conservatives must be absolutely certain, and that’s why we must scrutinize Pryor’s record as if we’ve just met the man.

Pryor, of course, was Alabama’s attorney general from 1997-2004 and enjoyed a reputation as a capable politician and a pretty good AG. He was placed on the U.S. 11th Circuit of Appeals by President George W. Bush, and during the decade since he’s become known as a very conservative judge, much like the late justice he may replace.

Conservative legal scholars tell us that Pryor strongly believes in judicial restraint, and holds that political questions must be left to the legislature, however unsettled, unwise, or unfortunate they may be, and that the Supreme Court must always limit its involvement with an issue to its constitutionality, and even then only after every other possible solution has failed.

Moreover, we’re told that when Pryor does believe the Supreme Court should take a look, it should apply what’s known as an “originalist” view (restricting one’s perspective by what the framers meant when they drafted the constitution, not what it could, would, or should mean in today’s world).

Pryor once said that Roe v. Wade was “the worst abomination in the history of constitutional law” and is reported to have ended a public prayer with “Please, God, no more Souters,” a reference to the infamously awful nomination of Justice David Souter by President George H.W. Bush.

Having someone on the court who believes such things would be a breath of fresh air, but there are those who have serious doubts. Normally, outlier criticisms wouldn’t garner much attention – if everyone agrees but one man in the corner throwing rocks, then odds are he’s either grinding an ax or he’s nuts. But then again, there’s also the slim chance he sees something others don’t.

An organization called the Judicial Action Group is currently one of those rock throwers. I’m not familiar with their leadership, but they issued a paper last week claiming that past rulings creat “an overwhelming likelihood that he would not be a constitutionalist on the Supreme Court.”

The group referenced two cases in which Pryor concurred with what they see as liberal, unconstitutional opinions.

First, in Glenn v. Brumby, they wrote that Pryor “usurped legislative power by purporting to judicially create – without precedent and without constitutional and statutory support – a new ‘transgender’ employment and bathroom right.” Secondly, in Keeton v. Wiley, they contend he “affirmed the expulsion of a female Christian student from a state college for refusing to engage in a ‘remediation plan’ of her views on sexuality which included the suggestion that she attend a ‘Gay Pride Parade.’”

Both issues sound like implausible situations, but such is the world we live in; the courts are making all sorts of nutty rulings, which is why conservatives must clearly understand why Pryor concurred.

Then there’s the time Pryor, as our state’s AG, helped remove Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore from office over ethics charges. While that decision was mostly about the role of our judges and the justice system rather than public prayer, conservatives are owed a solid explanation.

Hillyer, who knows Pryor and examined many of the cases at issue, has written that the “criticisms don’t stand up to scrutiny.”
I trust Hillyer, so that’s good news, but scrutinize Pryor, we must.

13 thoughts on “Conservatives must scrutinize Bill Pryor’s record

  1. 化妝包

    CLINIQUE 倩碧線上購物官網。瀏覽Clinique倩碧官方網站,了解更多線上購物、護膚、彩粧、香氛及禮品詳情。通過過敏性測試,百分百不含香料。

  2. Adidas NMD Men Fur Light Grey

    My wife and i got satisfied that Ervin could deal with his basic research while using the precious recommendations he made using your blog. It’s not at all simplistic just to find yourself releasing solutions which many people may have been making money from. And we all figure out we’ve got the blog owner to give thanks to for this. The entire explanations you’ve made, the simple site navigation, the friendships your site help to foster – it’s got all exceptional, and it is facilitating our son and our family recognize that this concept is thrilling, and that’s truly indispensable. Many thanks for all!

  3. 醫學美容 耳穴 cosmetic.wiki

    華山市場銀飾珠寶店-蓁品珠寶銀飾設計製作,善導寺手工訂製銀飾珠寶,價錢合理且能客製化的手作銀飾精品 – emily愛玩美 – FashionGuide 華人時尚專業評鑑 愛美的女人都知道穿搭時搭配有質感的飾品點綴,會讓整體造型和氣質更出眾。不過一般若提起[珠寶首飾]、[手工訂製]或[客製化銀飾珠寶]這類的字眼,都會直接讓人聯想到高不可攀的價錢,其實想要精緻且有品味的銀…,

  4. 醫學美容 SPECTRA 1064 激光美白

    青春雖然一去不返,但如果有機會,你又會唔會重新捉緊青春嘅尾巴?CLEVIEL 高濃度透明質酸 就為你打開人生新一頁,令你嘅肌膚重新充滿光澤,回復年輕彈性! 同惱人皺紋等老化現象Says Goodbye!CLEVIEL Prime 功能: 提升 ◆ 結構提升◆ 改善臉部輪廓◆ 新加入無痛配方 最佳適用範圍: ✔前額 ✔太陽穴 ✔顴骨 ✔面頰 ✔虎紋 CLEVIEL Contour+ 最佳適用範圍:✔鼻 ✔下巴 ✔虎紋

  5. yeezy boost 350 v2

    I just wanted to compose a brief word to be able to express gratitude to you for those stunning recommendations you are sharing on this site. My extensive internet look up has at the end of the day been recognized with brilliant content to go over with my two friends. I would express that many of us website visitors actually are really endowed to live in a magnificent place with many marvellous people with good strategies. I feel really fortunate to have seen your website page and look forward to some more pleasurable minutes reading here. Thanks a lot again for a lot of things.

  6. adidas yeezy boost

    I must show my affection for your kind-heartedness supporting individuals who really want assistance with this one area of interest. Your very own dedication to getting the message along has been extremely invaluable and have always empowered many people much like me to get to their endeavors. This helpful facts can mean this much a person like me and substantially more to my fellow workers. With thanks; from everyone of us.

  7. 假鼻

    有關眼袋手術、眼袋淚溝手術、眼袋、黑眼圈、淚溝、割眼袋、眼袋成形術、內開法脂肪下移筋膜修補、術前術後等一些詳細敘述或似是而非或有爭議的事項。

  8. 醫學美容 穿衣 cosmetic.wiki

    果凍矽膠真的比較好嗎? – 整形達人 PSBEAUTY – FashionGuide 華人時尚專業評鑑 今年最為讓大家振奮的消息,莫過於衛生署於七月底將果凍矽膠隆乳解禁,經過了兩年的等待,本地的隆乳消費者終於有機會與歐美先進國家婦女一樣享有高品質的隆乳手術與服務,不久的將來等義乳廠商取得進口執照後,果凍…,

  9. yeezy boost 350

    My spouse and i got so glad when Louis managed to deal with his preliminary research through the ideas he discovered when using the web site. It is now and again perplexing to just happen to be offering tips and tricks which usually people today could have been trying to sell. We recognize we have got the website owner to be grateful to for that. Most of the illustrations you’ve made, the straightforward web site menu, the relationships you help to instill – it’s got many remarkable, and it’s letting our son and us understand the issue is awesome, which is quite mandatory. Thank you for the whole thing!

  10. golden goose sneakers

    I’m also commenting to let you understand of the nice encounter my daughter encountered using yuor web blog. She realized numerous details, not to mention what it’s like to possess an awesome helping style to get many more smoothly know just exactly certain very confusing issues. You really surpassed visitors’ expected results. Many thanks for rendering those helpful, trusted, revealing as well as easy thoughts on the topic to Lizeth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.