Mo Brooks was correct to oppose phony repeal-and-replace bill

The few conservatives we have in Congress have suddenly found themselves caught in a traditional V-shaped ambush, with bands of intersecting fire coming from both Republicans and Democrats.

From the establishment’s left, their efforts to repeal Obamacare were called unconscionable, cruel and even corrupt. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said it represented “a merciless assault on working families.”

But conservatives were only trying to save the healthcare market from an inevitable financial death spiral that’d leave those families with the type of substandard care seen in most European nations.

From the establishment’s right, their pledge to vote against its poorly written replacement – the American Health Care Act – was also described as too demanding, puritanical, and even disloyal. President Donald Trump, reeling after the bill’s defeat, sent this tweet: “Democrats are smiling in D.C. that the Freedom Caucus, with the help of Club For Growth and Heritage, have saved Planned Parenthood & Ocare!”

But conservatives were only trying to keep the promise they (and Trump) made to repeal – in its entirety – Obamacare, and not simply tweak the program here and there.

Regardless of what the establishment may think, Americans owe a debt of gratitude to most of the members of the Freedom Caucus, and especially to U.S. Rep. Mo Brooks of Hunstville.

Brooks, along with every Republican member of our state’s Congressional delegation, promised that he’d vote to repeal Obamacare when given the chance. But when push came to shove, only Brooks kept that promise, and he kept it while under immense professional and personal pressure to flip.

“As much as I would like to vote with many of my Republican colleagues in Congress and in the White House (most of whom privately tell me they dislike the bad policy in this bill), I will vote against the American Health Care Act because it has more bad policy than any bill I have ever faced,” Brooks said in a statement last week. “I simply cannot, and will not, vote for bad legislation that hurts so many Americans solely because Washington friends and colleagues ask me to.”

That’s what voters want – for our elected officials to keep a promise, a whole promise, and nothing but a promise.

Brooks did. Most of his Republican colleagues did not.

Why?

We’ve heard every reason from “Half a loaf is better than no loaf at all,” to “Get what we can now and come back for more later.”

The problem with these sorry excuses is that the bill cemented Obamacare’s foundational policies while apparently giving them the Republican Party’s seal of approval. So are we to expect them to vote to retain a harmful Obamacare regulation now, when their position is strongest, then repeal it later when their position is weaker? Nonsense.

Also, while incrementalism is normally a sensible path, in Washington it nearly always runs in one direction – growth! Government programs slowly increase. They rarely ever slowly decrease. Conservatives shouldn’t, and some didn’t, naively expect this trend to magically change.

Meanwhile, there were ample reasons for true conservatives to oppose the bill, for it ran contrary to many of our movement’s most favored processes.

Conservatives believe in the process of subsidiarity, which is allowing a problem to be solved by whatever capable entity that is smallest, least centralized, or closest to the problem to begin with. So why should a conservative support a bill that has our largest entity – the federal government – making detailed decisions that could best be handled by one of our smallest entities – a patient, a doctor, and an insurance provider?

Conservatives believe in the process of limited government. So why should they support a bill that has the federal government retaining authorities and responsibilities that are best left to individuals, families, businesses, or at the very most state governments?

Conservatives also believe in the free market process. So why should they vote for a bill that tells a company it must provide certain benefits to every one of its customers, even if some don’t need or even want that particular product?

There’s no good reason for a conservative to do any of those things, and that’s why Mo Brooks was entirely justified by not supporting that phony repeal-and-replace bill.

13 thoughts on “Mo Brooks was correct to oppose phony repeal-and-replace bill

  1. VENUS VIVA

    Ion Magnum 是一種最新的減脂儀器,可以快速燃燒掉你身體的脂肪 , 讓你不需要做大量的體育鍛煉 , 輕鬆方便的達到專業美體的效果。 效果: 通過將你體內的脂肪轉化成肌肉,輕鬆减掉你的體重和腰圍。25分鐘的理療比健身房幾個小時的運動效果還要好! 副作用/風險: 該設備已在美國食品藥品監督管理局注册,注册分類爲醫療器械I類,I類醫療器械就是指普通人使用安全性非常好且沒有任何風險的器械。 减脂過程: 减脂板會直接固定安放於你身體的目標减肥部位,通過特殊的信號,Ion Magnum會將該部位的脂肪燃燒轉化成肌肉。(注意:該設備與你在其他沙龍中瞭解的肌肉轉化設備是完全不同的。)療程: 要想取得而保持完美的效果,一個療程需要進行10次理療,每3-7天進行一次。維持理療可以每兩周進行一次。

  2. adidas ultra boost uncaged

    I have to show some appreciation to you just for rescuing me from this type of predicament. Because of exploring throughout the search engines and coming across opinions which are not pleasant, I thought my entire life was over. Being alive without the solutions to the problems you have sorted out as a result of your entire article content is a critical case, and the kind which may have badly affected my entire career if I had not encountered your blog post. Your know-how and kindness in controlling all the details was priceless. I’m not sure what I would’ve done if I hadn’t come across such a step like this. It’s possible to at this time look forward to my future. Thanks for your time very much for your reliable and results-oriented help. I will not think twice to recommend your web page to anyone who wants and needs guidelines about this problem.

  3. yeezy boost

    I’m just writing to make you be aware of of the nice discovery my wife’s daughter encountered reading your blog. She discovered so many details, not to mention how it is like to have an incredible helping mindset to have others without hassle fully understand several specialized matters. You actually did more than visitors’ desires. I appreciate you for churning out these warm and helpful, safe, edifying as well as cool guidance on your topic to Janet.

  4. 醫學美容 獨家IELLIOS療程 cosmedicbook

    防曬粉 BB粉底霜 亮麗柔滑打底乳液 亮麗柔滑控油打底乳液 有機幹細胞修護CC霜 潤澤防曬底霜 礦物質潤澤慕斯 礦物質奇幻粉餅 礦物質蜜粉 完美礦物粉底 控油定妝蜜粉 高清控油粉餅 控油蜜 保濕滋潤噴霧 有機抗氧爽膚噴霧 有機抗敏保濕

  5. 乾燥

    在有效並溫和清理角質的同時,保持肌膚水油平衡。同時提升肌膚光亮度、光滑度和柔軟度,適合倩碧第四號肌膚類型。

  6. Adidas NMD New White Pink

    I intended to send you that bit of word to be able to say thanks a lot again for these unique principles you’ve discussed above. This is quite pretty generous of you giving publicly all a lot of people might have supplied for an e-book to earn some profit on their own, particularly considering that you might have tried it in the event you considered necessary. The good ideas as well served to become great way to understand that many people have the identical keenness the same as my own to understand great deal more on the topic of this problem. I’m sure there are lots of more enjoyable occasions in the future for people who read carefully your site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.